wolframscience.com

A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum > Pure NKS > Predecessor state to simple conditions
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Lawrence J. Thaden


Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 350

Predecessor state to simple conditions

Here is a CA that can be started with the simple conditions having the middle two cells {2, 2} while the rest of the cells are all zeros. It has a complex symmetric behavior and concludes after 127 steps with a persistent structure 356 steps in length.

But is it possible to have this set of simple initial conditions be the result of updating a previous set of conditions that is not simple? Yes, when the predecessor state is: {0,1,0,2,0,1,0,2,0,1,0,2,0,1,0,2,0,2,2,0,2,0,1,0,2,0,1,0,2,0,1,0,2,0,1,0}.

In the attached image I actually start the CA with initial conditions: {2,1,1,1,2,1,2,2,2,2,2,1,0,1,0,0,2,1,1,2,0,0,1,0,1,2,2,2,2,2,1,2,1,1,1,2}. It then evolves 532 steps before reaching the predecessor state to the simple conditions.

I have marked the spot on the graph with a horizontal red line.

The rule used in this CA is a four variable, three color rule: Mod[-2 (-1 + p) r + q (2 + s), 3]. The rule is an algebraic expression which has variables p, q, r, and s. When the rule is evaluated for a cell, the value of the next nearest neighbor on the left is assigned to variable p; the value of the nearest neighbor on the left is assigned to variable q; the value of the nearest neighbor on the right is assigned to variable r; and the value of the next nearest neighbor on the right is assigned to variable s. The algebraic expression is then simplified modulo 3, and the result is stored as the updated cell.

Lawrence J. Thaden has attached this image:

__________________
L. J. Thaden

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-14-2004 07:31 PM
Lawrence J. Thaden is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Lawrence J. Thaden Click here to Send Lawrence J. Thaden a Private Message Click Here to Email Lawrence J. Thaden Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Jason Cawley
Wolfram Science Group
Phoenix, AZ USA

Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 712

Interesting. Reminds me of page 443...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-14-2004 08:27 PM
Jason Cawley is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Jason Cawley Click here to Send Jason Cawley a Private Message Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Lawrence J. Thaden


Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 350

Had not thought of it in terms of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Alas! It is not reversible.

__________________
L. J. Thaden

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-15-2004 04:18 AM
Lawrence J. Thaden is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Lawrence J. Thaden Click here to Send Lawrence J. Thaden a Private Message Click Here to Email Lawrence J. Thaden Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


 

wolframscience.com  |  wolfram atlas  |  NKS online  |  web resources  |  contact us

Forum Sponsored by Wolfram Research

© 2004-13 Wolfram Research, Inc. | Powered by vBulletin 2.3.0 © 2000-2002 Jelsoft Enterprises, Ltd. | Disclaimer | Archives