OriHalcon
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 1 |
Can "hardware-implemented" CAs be useful?
Hi all. Im a electronics systems engineer and im going to start doctor's degree this year.
Ive been making some hardware implementations of CAs into FPGAs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-...able_gate_array) .
With this implementations you can reach much higher speeds than using a computer because all the cells are implemented and all the CA evolutes in just one step, instead of analyse the state of just one cell at the same time (what a computer does).
But there is a problem: these implementations are only useful when you want to make A LOT of evolution steps, i mean, if the computer does all the work in 1 sec, implement the CA on a FPGA doesnt make any sense.
One of my objectives is make an application/Mathematica interface that, defining a CA behavior, it implements it automatically on a FPGA and give us the control of the CA in order to write initial states, make it evolute ect.
All this is a hard work (i already have some parts done), so the question is, can this be useful for someone?
Thanks!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|