Jason Cawley
Wolfram Science Group
Phoenix, AZ USA
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 712 |
I am find attempts to link phenomena of consciousness to QM forced, and I think NKS offers evidence against the idea. Part of the motivation has always been trying to deal with determinism and unpredictability - when those can be explained by irreducible complexity. Arguments like those of Penrose seem to me to be based on misunderstandings about Turing universality and realizable computations. Some participants in the discussion seem to think without real number infinities everything will be reducible, simple, and predictable. Which just isn't so - irreducibility and intractability arises already, well on the near side of that cardinality divide.
Besides lacking sufficient motivation, I think QM-consciousness links predict characteristics of consciousness that I just do not see in the phenomena. Bump your head and you do not develop a new personality. Consciousness simply is not fragile, and QM effects clearly are. If entangled anything is to matter it can only do so in tiny details, because the basic system characteristics have an entirely different sensitivity profile. The sort of unpredictability any complex calculation shows before you follow it out, sure, but the sort that will change if leaf blows by, no.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|