Registered: May 2009
Posts: 172

IS DARK MATTER THE EVIDENCE FOR MULTIVERSE ANTIELECTROMAGNETISM?
IS DARK ENERGY THE EVIDENCE FOR MULTIVERSE ANTIGRAVITATION?
IS SPACE ROAR THE PROOF THAT ALTERNATE UNIVERSES EXIST?

The classic Riemannian metric solution of the Einstein field equations that describes a homogeneous and isotropic universe is called the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric, or "FLRW", after Friedmann and also after Lemaître, Robertson, and Walker, who worked on the problem in the 1920's and 30's independently of Friedman. The FLRW model is now used as the standard model for cosmology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedm...n-Walker_metric

******
WHAT IS THE MAIN ISSUE?
(I) If dark matter obeys Einstein's equivalence principle, then the FLRW model should be correct.
(II) If dark matter has positive gravitational mass-energy and zero inertial mass-energy, then the FWEU timing theory should be correct — thus validating the theory of modified M-theory with alternate universes with an underlying Wolframian automaton.
******

Is the FLRW model the M-theoretically correct answer assuming M-theory without alternate universes? Does the FLRW model require significant correction because it fails to incorporate the mathematics for the empirical reality of dark matter? What is dark matter? Consider the following 4 hypotheses:
(1) The maximum physical wavelength is the Planck length multiplied by the Fredkin-Wolfram constant.
(2) M-theory describes the Wolframian automaton that underlies all of physics.
(3) During each Planck time interval, precisely one real photon exits our observable universe and enters an alternate universe, and, simultaneously, precisely one virtual photon enters our observable universe from some alternate universe. The energies of the real photon and the virtual photon are the minimum positive energy. Over cosmological time, the real photons exiting is the explanation for dark energy. Over cosmological time, the virtual photons entering is the explanation for dark matter.
Are the 3 preceding physical hypotheses valid?
The derivation of the FLRW metric implicitly assumes that the expansion of the universe is an adiabatic process. According to the f(div) theory and the FWEU timing theory, the expansion of the universe is an extremely diabatic process because the % of dark matter increases over spans of cosmological time. Electromagnetic energy is constantly being transferred from the observable universe to elsewhere in the multiverse. The electromagnetic energy is replaced by dark matter so that net energy is conserved in the universe. The fine-structure constant does not change because the antigravity effect of dark energy is matched by the antielectromagnetic effect of the increase in % of dark matter. Is there empirical evidence for the prediction that the % of dark matter increases over spans of cosmological time?

Consider the space roar:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_roar .

What is the explanation of the space roar? If NKS Chapter 9 is empirically valid and alternate universes obey the principles of f(div) theory and FWEU timing theory, then what? The currently-used standard model for cosmology should predict an amount of radio frequency noise from the early universe that is far smaller than the observed amount of radio frequency noise. Does the currently-used standard model for cosmology seem to fail to correctly model dark matter and to fail to explain space roar? Is space roar caused by weird particles or weird radio galaxies unknown to contemporary science? IS SPACE ROAR THE FIRST STRONG EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTING BOTH M-THEORY AND FREDKIN’S FINITE NATURE HYPOTHESIS? Is the combination of M-theory with the ideas of Fredkin and Wolfram the key to understanding dark matter and dark energy? Does the Wolfram updating parameter in Wolfram’s mobile automaton provide the Planck-timing mechanism that governs the multiverse? Does the Wolframian automaton yield the cosmological timing mechanism for dark matter? Does the FLRW model yield the cosmological timing mechanism that assumes dark matter is standard mass-energy obeying Einstein's equivalence principle? If dark matter is not standard mass-energy obeying Einstein's equivalence principle, then do we have strong evidence for NKS Chapter 9 and also for M-theory with alternate universes?
IS WOLFRAM ON A LEVEL WITH NEWTON AND EINSTEIN BECAUSE HE IS THE FIRST PHYSICIST TO UNDERSTAND THAT BELL'S INEQUALITIES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FREDKIN TIME BELOW THE LEVEL OF THE PLANCK SCALE? "In theoretical physics, '''Bell's theorem''' is a no-go theorem, loosely stating that:
No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem

Is replacing time, space, and energy by Fredkin time, Fredkin distance, and Fredkin digit transition the only way to find a valid model of dark matter and dark energy? Is NKS Chapter 9 the ONLY WAY to get a valid explanation of space roar?
*****
NOTE: An alternative to the f(div) theory and the FWEU timing theory is that a real photon gets converted into a perfectly sterile neutrino. In this case, the f(div) theory would be wrong and Fredkin-factor would be identically zero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterile_neutrino

Last edited by David Brown on 05-27-2010 at 09:15 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Not Yet
Posts: N/A

Thank you to those interpretations
nice post :)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged