Registered: May 2009
Informational analogue of Newton's laws of motion
Consider the 3 laws of the Fredkin-Wolfram information process:
1. Every informational bit in the Fredkin-Wolfram conglomerate obeys the Wolfram updating parameter law.
2. The Fredkin-Wolfram conglomerate and the Wolfram updating parameter operate so that for every computation with respect to charge, parity, and time there is an equal and opposite re-computation.
3. Given any valid model of M-theory which unites the 4 forces, the number of updates it takes for the Wolfram updating parameter to create the next model of M-theory is a constant.
At energy densities supporting free quarks, do guardian magnetic monopoles reveal the instability of spacetime? Why might M-theory be dependent upon the Fredkin-Wolfram information process, informational antigravitons, and guardian magnetic monopoles? Consider a speculative hypothesis: The Law of Quantum Wave Function Collapse. For every collapse of a quantum probability wave function into an observable state in an observable universe, there is an equal and opposite collapse in the collapsed wave’s antimatter partner wave in the antimatter partner of that observable universe. The collapse and its anti-collapse are mediated by guardian magnetic monopoles. The computational basis of quantum wave function collapse requires alternate universes and the Fredkin-Wolfram information process.
What might be a simple explanation of dark energy and dark matter in terms of the Fredkin-Wolfram information process? What is the Fredkin-Wolfram dual computation of a photon? Is the answer an informational antigraviton? What is the Fredkin-Wolfram dual computation of a graviton? Is the answer a guardian magnetic monopole?
Is it possible that dark energy possesses neither inertial mass-energy nor gravitational mass-energy but does possess antigravitational mass-energy? Is it possible that dark matter does have not inertial mass-energy but does have gravitational mass-energy? Is it possible that both dark energy and dark matter are non-real informational corrections? Are dark energy and dark matter the proof that the Fredkin-Wolfram constant is essential for understanding the logical foundations of physics?
Are the fundamental principles underlying physics mathematically isomorphic to a Fredkin-Wolfram information process that computes superstrings and also isomorphic to all sufficiently complicated systems found in the natural world? What is Wolfram’s Principle of Computational Equivalence?
Almost all processes that are not obviously simple can be viewed as computations of equivalent sophistication. – Stephen Wolfram, NKS
Is the multiverse a computational system based upon information spread across alternate universes? Are the mechanisms of the multiverse fully revealed in any sufficiently complicated sample of the observable universe? Is randomness always ignorance of underlying mathematical determinism?
One can give good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But nobody knows how to find the basis of such a theory. – Einstein, “Meaning of Relativity”
If there is a purely algebraic or purely computational mathematical model for physical reality, then are energy and spacetime likely to be derived constructions? Are quantum information and mathematical rules for quantum information the principles forming the basis for noncommutative geometric quantum field theory?
Consider 10 questions:
Is dark energy the empirical evidence for antigravitation among alternate universes? Is dark matter the empirical evidence for antielectromagnetism among alternate universes?
How does nature compute M-branes or superstrings? Are M-branes or superstrings the fundamental form of quantum information?
Does dark energy’s explanation consist of M-theoretic mathematical models for dark energy? Does dark matter’s explanation consist of M-theoretic mathematical models for dark matter?
Is digital informational epistemology the explanation for the higher dimensionality found in M-theory? Is digital informational epistemology the basis for the fundamental computational method of M-theory? Are detections of paradigm-breaking photons essential for establishing the empirical basis necessary for both digital informational epistemology and M-theory? Are dark energy and dark matter the only two fundamental problems that M-theory needs to explain?
The only justification for our concepts and systems of concepts is that they serve to represent the complex of our experiences; beyond this they have no legitimacy. – Einsten, “The Meaning of Relativity”
Is the only justification for string theory to be found in the empirical failures of quantum electrodynamics and general relativity theory? Is the role of string theory to explain dark energy, dark matter, Guth’s inflation, ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, and the structure among alternate universes?
Last edited by David Brown on 07-19-2009 at 01:31 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged