wolframscience.com

A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum > Applied NKS > Does the Koide formula empirically confirm M-theory?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
David Brown


Registered: May 2009
Posts: 176

Does the Koide formula empirically confirm M-theory?

What is the physical meaning of Koide’s formula? If M-theory is a fundamental part of the way that nature works and the Koide formula is not a numerical coincidence, then does M-theory need to explain Koide’s formula?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
Can M-theorists use M-theory to explain the mathematics found in Gerald Rosen’s paper “Heuristic Development of a Dirac-Goldhaber Model for Lepton and Quark Structures” and the mathematics found in Carl Brannen’s “The Lepton Masses”?
http://home.comcast.net/~gerald-rosen/heuristicmpla.pdf Gerald Rosen's paper
http://www.brannenworks.com/MASSES2.pdf
Can M-theory predict elementary particle masses by means of the following idea?
Use AdS/CFT correspondence and ideas of Piotr Zenczykowski on the Harari-Shupe preon model to embed into M-theory the mathematics used by Koide and the preon-motivated mathematics used by Gerald Rosen, Carl Brannen, and others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008arXiv0803.0223Z “The Harari-Shupe preon model and nonrelativistic quantum phase space”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preon
Does M-theory as originally formulated by Witten lead to an explanation of elementary particle masses, even if M-theorists reject the theory of modified M-theory with Wolfram’s automaton? Does the Koide formula empirically confirm two mutually exclusive theories: (1) M-theory with a curling-up mechanism and (2) modified M-theory with Wolfram’s automaton and an information transfer mechanism from alternate universes?
Is M-theory the way of solving the problem of the infinite self-energy of the electron under the assumption that time is continuous? Is Wolfram’s concept of time correct? Is modified M-theory with Wolfram’s automaton the way that nature solves two problems: the infinite self-energy of the electron and the ambiguous self-energy of the electron?
If Wolfram’s automaton is the underlying deterministic theory for quantum field theory, then why does Wolfram need M-theory? Deriving the mathematics of quantum field theory and general relativity theory from a finite automaton seems profoundly difficult and M-theory seems to be the only suitable candidate for such a derivation. Why do the M-theorists need Wolfram’s automaton? Could space roar be the empirical proof that Wolfram is correct and that M-theorists need Wolfram’s automaton?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_roar
Besides space roar, what might be another argument in favor of Wolfram’s automaton? According to quantum field theory, the vacuum energy should make our universe orders-of-magnitude noisier and hotter than observations indicate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_catastrophe
Is the vacuum catastrophe a strong indication that Wolfram is correct?
http://wolframscience.com/reference/quick_takes.html
FUNDAMENTAL CLAIM: M-theory as originally formulated has too many models because it is the ambiguous limit of modified M-theory with Wolfram’s automaton as the Fredkin-Wolfram constant approaches infinity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory
Is spacetime four-dimensional because the quaternions are the only mathematical structure supporting a consistent physics with linear time and noncommutative geometry?
Claim 1. M-theory is the only plausible path to the unification of gravitation with U(1) X SU(2) X SU(3) physics. However, space roar and dark energy indicate that any new particles that are predicted by M-theory can be predicted by quantum field theory without M-theory.
Claim 2. Space roar is the physical manifestation of the Wolframian updating parameter. In NKS Chapter 9, Wolfram has created a new concept of time that empirical evidence seems to confirm. Wolfram’s cosmological principle, THE MAXIMUM PHYSICAL WAVELENGTH IS THE PLANCK LENGTH TIMES THE FREDKIN-WOLFRAM CONSTANT, is needed for a valid theory of cosmology.
Claim 3. Dark matter is virtual mass-energy that has zero inertial mass-energy and positive gravitational mass-energy. Dark matter is empirical evidence that alternate universes exist.
Claim 4. Dark energy is virtual mass-energy that has zero inertial mass-energy and negative gravitational mass-energy. Dark energy is empirical evidence that alternate universes exist.
What empirical evidence do I have to support Claims 1-4? I have posted quantitative explanations of space roar, the Rañada effect for the Pioneer anomaly, and Milgrom’s Law. I think the odds of each explanation being a numerical coincidence might be 10 to 1 against, so I think the odds are 1,000 to 1 against my theory being rubbish — HOWEVER, I COULD BE QUITE WRONG! Weird forces from alternate universes require superabundant empirical evidence in their favor.
What is the explanation for the generations (or families) found in particle physics?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genera...rticle_physics)
Quaternionic Deterministic M-theory Hypothesis: In quantum field theory, virtual energy has only one virtual energy-density level. In modified M-theory with Wolfram’s automaton, virtual energy has 3 energy-density levels: low, medium, and high. Virtual energy is a digital approximation to quaternionic energy spread across alternate universes. Real energy is virtual energy that is implicitly or explicitly measured by Wolfram’s automaton. Quantum field theory is 100% accurate unless spacetime breaks down. Modified general relativity theory has 3 distinct epochs based upon virtual energy from alternate universes: the cosmological constant epoch with a nonzero cosmological constant and -1/2 in the field equations replaced by -1/2 +FF/2, the inflation epoch with the cosmological constant replaced by the inflation-epoch-constant and -1/2 replaced by -1/2 + inflation-epoch-factor/2, and the grand unification epoch with the cosmological constant replaced by the grand-unification-constant and -1/2 replace by -1/2 + grand-unification-factor/2. In terms of quantum field theory, the cosmological constant epoch is U(1) X SU(2) X SU(3) physics, the inflation epoch is SU(5) physics, and the grand unification epoch is SU(8) physics.
M-theoretical Virtual Energy-density Hypothesis (Fredkin-Wolfram Version): There is a mathematical formulation of M-theory that justifies thinking about the 11-dimensional fundamental domain of M-theory as consisting of matter time, antimatter time, 3-space with low virtual energy-density level and virtual energy operator Op1, 3-space with medium virtual energy-density level and virtual energy operator Op2, and 3-space with high virtual energy-density level and virtual energy operator Op3. The 3 generations of particle physics are caused by the Nambu transfer machine. M-theory is a smoothing of the Nambu transfer machine, which uses Nambu digital data created by the Fredkin delivery machine. In M-theory with Wolfram’s automaton, SU(8) physics presents approximate unifications of each set of 3 generational versions of the same particle. Given a unified particle P in SU(8) physics, trace(Op1(P) + Op2(P) + Op3(P)) represents the frequency of the unified 3-generational particle P, while sqrt(||Op1(P)||**2 + ||Op2(P)||**2 + ||Op3(P)||**2) represents the generalized gravitational acceleration of the unified 3-generational particle P. The Koide formula is a consequence of the generalized gravitational force law for the unified 3-generational particle P, where P is formed from the 3 charged leptons.
M-theoretical Virtual Energy-density Hypothesis (Seiberg-Witten Version): There is a mathematical formulation of M-theory that justifies thinking about the 11-dimensional fundamental domain of M-theory as consisting of matter time, antimatter time, 3-space with low virtual energy-density level and virtual energy operator Op1, 3-space with medium virtual energy-density level and virtual energy operator Op2, and 3-space with high virtual energy-density level and virtual energy operator Op3. The 3 generations of particle physics are caused by the curling-up mechanism which explains how to predict paradigm-breaking new particles from M-theory. The curling-up mechanism takes the 3 levels of virtual energy-density levels and averages them into standard matter, sterile dark matter, and dark energy. In M-theory with the curling-up mechanism, SU(8) physics presents approximate unifications of each set of 3 generational versions of the same particle. Given a unified particle P in SU(8) physics, trace(Op1(P) + Op2(P) + Op3(P)) represents the frequency of the unified 3-generational particle P, while sqrt(||Op1(P)||**2 + ||Op2(P)||**2 + ||Op3(P)||**2) represents the generalized gravitational acceleration of the unified 3-generational particle P. The Koide formula is a consequence of the generalized gravitational force law for the unified 3-generational particle P, where P is formed from the 3 charged leptons.

Last edited by David Brown on 01-24-2011 at 04:42 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-14-2011 06:44 PM
David Brown is offline Click Here to See the Profile for David Brown Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


 

wolframscience.com  |  wolfram atlas  |  NKS online  |  Wolfram|Alpha  |  Wolfram Science Summer School  |  web resources  |  contact us

Forum Sponsored by Wolfram Research

© 2004-14 Wolfram Research, Inc. | Powered by vBulletin 2.3.0 © 2000-2002 Jelsoft Enterprises, Ltd. | Disclaimer | Archives