David Brown
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 177 
Does Mtheory with Wolfram's automaton explain the Pioneer anomaly?
If Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine is a valid theory, then does it explain the Pioneer anomaly?
YES, INDEED! — or my theory is completely wrong.
When all known forces acting on the each of the two Pioneer spacecraft are taken into consideration, a very small but unexplained force remains. It appears to cause a constant sunward acceleration of (8.74±1.33) * 10**(10) m/sec**2, for both spacecraft. If the positions of the spacecraft are predicted one year in advance based on measured velocity and known forces (mostly gravity), they are actually found to be some 400 kilometers closer to the sun at the end of the year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_anomaly
According to Turyshev & Toth, “Radiometric Doppler tracking data received from the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft from heliocentric distances of 20 – 70 AU has consistently indicated the presence of a small anomalous blueshifted frequency drift uniformly changing with a rate of ~ 6 * 10**(9) Hz/sec (or cycles/sec**2). Various distributions of dark matter in the solar system have been proposed to explain the anomaly … However, it would have to be a special smooth distribution of dark matter that is not gravitationally modulated as normal matter so obviously is. …
Ultimately, the search for the Pioneer anomaly came down to one question: “Is it the heat or not the heat?””
Slava G. Turyshev & Viktor T. Toth, ''The Pioneer Anomaly'', ''Living Rev. Relativity'' 13, 2010, 4
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr20104
IT’S UNEXPECTED HEAT LOSS DUE TO EXCESS FREDKIN RED SHIFT! — or my theory is completely wrong.
I have suggested that the 1/2 in Einstein’s field equations needs to be replaced by 1/2 + FF/2. Note that, in my theory, the distribution of dark matter is very smooth, because socalled dark matter is really a necessary adjustment to Einstein’s field equations. I have suggested a theory based upon 4 cosmological principles that I assigned the names of Witten, Wolfram, Fredkin, and Einstein. The Wolfram and Fredkin principles are extremely controversial. In particular, I suggest that Newton’s force law should be replaced by:
Nongravitational force = mass times acceleration.
Gravitational force = (mass times Newtonian gravitational acceleration) plus (mass times acceleration due to Fredkin dark matter force that INCREASES GRAVITATIONAL RED SHIFT BEYOND EINSTEIN’S RED SHIFT PREDICTION by a very small consistent increase).
According to Einstein’s “The meaning of relativity”, pages 9192, there is a gravitational redshift precisely calculable in terms of general relativity theory. If receivingstationredshift(∆) is defined to be the redshifted gravitational first timederivative predicted by Einstein at distance ∆ from the sun precisely at the site of the receiving station for the Doppler tracking data, then:
FF * (∫ receivingstationredshift(∆) d∆) / (2 epsilon AU) represents the Fredkin excess redshift for the Pioneer Doppler tracking data, where the integration is carried out for ∆ from 1 minus epsilon to 1 plus epsilon astronomical units. (Almost all of the gravitational red shift for the Pioneer incoming signal occurs near the receiving station. According to my theory, not only does this particular signal have an unexpectedly large gravitational redshift but so do all photons everywhere in our universe.)
THEREFORE, FF * (∫ receivingstationredshift(∆) d∆) / (2 epsilon AU) must equal roughly sqrt(60) * 10**(5) hertz if my theory has any hope of being correct. This value of FF must explain all the dark matter in our observable universe, or else my theory is completely wrong,
According to my analysis, my theory fails without Mtheory because there would be no Nambu transfer machine. Conversely, Mtheory would fail without the Nambu transfer machine, because space roar rules out a curlingup mechanism for Mtheory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mtheory
Mtheorists, at this stage, do not agree with me. If empirical evidence proves my theory is correct, then Mtheorists shall rush to embrace it. If empirical evidence proves my theory is incorrect, then I believe that Mtheory would then have to be drastically revised but that Mtheorists would stubbornly cling to what they have now.
**********
If the cosmological constant has a value of roughly (10**4) ((eV)**4) and we adopt for dark matter the value sqrt(60/4) * 10**5 ((eV)**4), then sqrt(60/4) * 10**5 * (72.8/22.7) ~ 10**4 to a crude approximation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LambdaCDM_model
**********
What is my bizarre theory all about?
Hypothesis 1. Some form of Mtheory is necessary because quantum field theory cannot predict gravitons.
Hypothesis 2. Space roar is the manifestation of the Wolframian updating parameter. Space roar is the proof that the Wolframian automaton with the Fredkin delivery machine and with the Nambu transfer machine is nature’s way of implementing Mtheory.
Hypothesis 3. Dark matter is virtual massenergy with zero inertial massenergy and positive gravitational massenergy. Dark energy is virtual massenergy mass with zero inertial massenergy and negative gravitational massenergy. Real massenergy is virtual massenergy that is explicitly or implicitly measured by the Wolframian automaton. Einstein’s equivalence principle is totally correct for real energy BUT FAILS BADLY FOR VIRTUAL MASSENERGY.
Hypothesis 4. Mtheory is the smoothing of the Nambu transfer machine. In order to define the Nambu transfer machine, Mtheorists need X, where X is to Mtheory as Kepler’s laws are to Newtonian mechanics. Precise information about the GZK paradox is what is needed.
Does this make sense to Mtheorists? (Other theoretical physicists are not of much help because they don’t know Mtheoretical mathematics.) Hugh Everett’s many worlds theory is important pioneering work but can’t make new predictions. However, I say that Mtheorists need my theory because it is the unique valid physical interpretation of Mtheory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Everett_III
**********
Note added 12302010: I noticed that Prof. Antonio F. Rañada has partially anticipated the content of this posting in his Jan. 2005 paper entitled “The Pioneer anomaly as acceleration of the clocks”. He says that the frequency of photons increases uniformly and adiabatically because of the expansion of the universe and his phenomenological theory; whereas, I say that the frequency of the photons increases uniformly and adiabatically because of my physical interpretation of Mtheory with Wolfram’s automaton.
http://arxiv.org/abs/grqc/0410084 “The Pioneer anomaly as acceleration of the clocks”
Last edited by David Brown on 01042011 at 11:54 AM
Report this post to a moderator  IP: Logged
