David Brown
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 176 
Space roar proves that Mtheory is empirically valid!
***
UPDATE ADDED 26 JAN. 2014 C.E.
D. Brown, "Are the Graviton, the Inflaton, and the Axion the Only Fundamental Particles that Remain to be Discovered?”, vixra.org, (18 Jan. 2014) http://vixra.org/abs/1401.0134
D. Brown, "Is the Space Roar an Essential Clue for Quantum Gravity?", vixra.org, (13 Jan. 2014) http://vixra.org/abs/1401.0101
D. Brown, "Is the Space Roar an Empirical Proof that the Inflaton Field Exists?", vixra.org, (24 Dec. 2013) http://vixra.org/abs/1312.0193
P. Kroupa, M. Pawlowski, and M. Milgrom, “The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm”, vixra.org, (16 Jan. 2013) http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.3907v1.pdf
The preceding 4 references describe a coherent theory of quantum gravity with 3 decisive empirical tests. String theory with the infinite nature hypothesis suggests the string landscape. String theory with the finite nature hypothesis suggests 3 decisive tests.
END OF UPDATE
***Does Mtheory solve the problem of the infinite selfenergy of the electron but leave the problem of the ambiguous selfenergy of the electron unsolved?
One consequence of replacing worldlines of particles by worldtubes of strings is that Feynman diagrams get smoothed out. â€” Edward Witten
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~witten/papers/Reflections.pdf
Does Mtheory derive from the smoothing out of the Nambu transfer machine? Does the Nambu transfer machine take information from a multitude of alternate universes and tranfer such information into approximations of physical reality? Have Mtheorists made the mistake of believing in the concept of infinity? Is infinity just as bogus as the concept of God? Is infinity just as unmeasurable as God? What is the only physically valid way to solve the problem of the ambiguous selfenergy of the electron? Is it Wolframâ€™s automaton?
Is Mtheory the only plausible way to unify gravitation and quantum field theory? Is Wolframâ€™s automaton the only plausible way to provide a new concept of time below the Planck scale? Does every Big Bang recycle in about 81.6 billion years according to hidden determinism? Does Einsteinâ€™s concept of hidden determinism replacing quantum theory point to Wolframâ€™s automaton?
If X is to Mtheory as Keplerâ€™s laws are to Newtonian mechanics then what is X? Is the answer the precise probability distributions of paradigmbreaking photons that escape from black holes? Are Mtheorists entirely sure that the BekensteinHawking radiation law is 100% empirically correct? Is it possible that the BekensteinHawking law is the limit of modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine as the FredkinWolfram constant approaches infinity?
Consider some hypotheses:
(1) The mathematics of Mtheory guarantees that it is the only way to unify gravitation and quantum field theory.
(2) Mtheory must have a physical interpretation that explains dark energy. There are only 3 basic ways to explain dark energy: weird new particles, weird forces from alternate universes, or dark energy stars in some form. The approach of weird new particles is modified Mtheory with a curlingup mechanism â€” this cannot explain the space roar. The approach of dark energy stars in some form cannot explain the space roar and also runs counter to Mtheory. The winner by default is weird forces from alternate universes.
(3) Einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle is completely true for real massenergy.
(4) Einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle is true for virtual massenergy if and only if there do not exist weird forces from alternate universes. (THIS IS A KEY POINT because, unless the equivalence principle fails, the original field equations cannot fail and the model does not allow dark energy. THEREFORE, in order to allow modified Mtheory to explain dark energy, weird forces from alternate universes must actually exist to explain the nonzero cosmological constant.)
(5) Virtual massenergy is spread out across a huge but finite number of alternate universes. Real massenergy is virtual massenergy that is implicitly or explicitly measured by Wolframâ€™s automaton.
(6) All virtual massenergy in the multiverse is virtual massenergy that is connected with weird forces from alternate universes. Dark matter is virtual massenergy that has zero inertial massenergy and positive gravitational massenergy. Dark energy is virtual massenergy that has zero inertial massenergy and negative gravitational massenergy. Any plausible alternate explanation of dark matter and/or dark energy is refuted by the space roar.
(7) Modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine predicts the f(div) theory, the space roar profile, and the existence of paradigmbreaking photons. Any other plausible modified Mtheory is refuted by the space roar.
(8) Modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine predicts that alternate universes occur in matter/antimatter pairs, thereby explaining the preponderance of matter over antimatter in our observable universe, which is a tiny part of the multiverse.
(9) The concept of the Wolframian updating parameter is valid if and only if it has a dramatic physical manifestation.
(10) Given plausible hypotheses about the approaches to the physical interpretation, modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine is the only plausible possibility for the physical interpretation of Mtheory. SPACE ROAR essentially proves that Mtheory is empirically valid.
CAVEAT ABOUT PREVIOUS POSTINGS by David Brown â€” I have only quite recently (since 12072010) convinced myself on point (10). Until I read Chaplineâ€™s ideas on dark energy stars I did not really understand my own theory. Only this posting and the previous posting entitled â€śWhat are the Keplerâ€™s laws of Mtheory?â€ť derive from my latest thinking. (The point that was not clear in my mind was the preceding (4). Chaplineâ€™s theory of dark energy stars is definitely wrong because it runs counter to Mtheory.)
**********
SUMMARY of the situation:
(A) Some form of modified Mtheory is guaranteed to be correct because nature unifies gravitation and quantum theory and because mathematics demands that Mtheory is the only plausible way to carry out such a unification.
(B) Space roar rules out every possible physical interpretation of a modified Mtheory except one interpretation which is modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine.
(C) Modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine demands that the only way to explain dark matter is that nature replaces the 1/2 in Einsteinâ€™s field equations with a constant which is very nearly 1/2. In other words, dark matter is the physical manifestation of alternate universe forces that attract ordinary matter.
(D) Modified Mtheory with the Nambu transfer machine demands that the only way to explain dark energy is that nature uses a nonzero cosmological constant in Einsteinâ€™s field equations. In other words, dark energy is the physical manifestation of alternate universe forces that repel ordinary matter.
Last edited by David Brown on 01262014 at 08:52 AM
Report this post to a moderator  IP: Logged
