David Brown
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 177 
Lightbulb, lightbulb, lightbulb ... NKS & Mtheorists
Can any competent Mtheorist understand the reason that Wolfram is an amazing genius once the LIGHTBULB goes on? The basic reason that Mtheorists have not yet made aweinspiring empirical predictions is VERY, VERY simple.
Mtheorists need to ask themselves this question: Is the problem with Mtheory that a new physical hypothesis is needed or MERELY that a new mathematical technique is needed? Wolfram understands the necessity of Mtheory but the point of Wolfram’s NKS Chapter 9 is that a new physical hypothesis is needed in Mtheory. This new hypothesis is that nature is finite and digital or, equivalently,
THE MAXIMUM PHYSICAL WAVELENGTH IS THE PLANCK LENGTH TIMES THE FREDKINWOLFRAM CONSTANT.
In contemporary Mtheory without the FredkinWolfram constant, if empirical predictions could be made, then the average expected lifetime of an observable universe would be infinite. By incorporating the FredkinWolfram constant into the computational method for Mtheory, the average expected lifetime of an observable universe becomes finite and all sorts of wonderful empirical predictions emerge. IT’S REALLY AS SIMPLE AS THAT … lightbulb, lightbulb, lightbulb.
**********************
Are there paradigmbreaking photons emerging from black holes? Consider 3 hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1. Near the boundary of a MathurLunin fuzzball, there is a nonzero probability that a ‘t HooftPolyakov monopole encounters its antimatter partner and undergoes annihilation. This annihilation is the physical basis of paradigmbreaking photons.
Hypothesis 2. Appearances of ‘t HooftPolyakov monopoles and their antimatter partners are the result of a physical process modeled by an anomalous WardTakahashi identify for monopoles. The anomaly is a chiral anomaly caused by alternate universes.
Hypothesis 3. The Fredkin Finite Nature Hypothesis is correct so that Mtheory is an approximation to some optimal lattice gauge/gravity correspondence model that is a better approximation than Mtheory itself.
*************************************
Is a guardian magnetic monopole the digitized version of a 't HooftPolyakov monopole? Are paradigmbreaking photons the explanation of the GZK paradox?
Last edited by David Brown on 05022010 at 09:20 AM
Report this post to a moderator  IP: Logged
