David Brown
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 176 
Does virtual massenergy obey Einstein's equivalence principle?
Is Mtheory without the insights of NKS Chapter 9 an empirically unsatisfactory theory? What does Mtheory predict? Consider two hypotheses:
Hypothesis Alpha: Mtheory with the minimal modification incorporating Wolfram’s cosmological principle explains dark matter, dark energy, and the GZK paradox.
Hypothesis Omega: Mtheory with no additional physical hypothesis has too many mathematical models and therefore cannot predict anything beyond a unification of quantum field theory with general relativity theory.
What is Wolfram’s cosmological principle?
THE MAXIMUM PHYSICAL WAVELENGTH EQUALS THE PLANCK LENGTH TIMES THE FREDKINWOLFRAM CONSTANT.
What does Wolfram’s cosmological principle imply under the assumption that informational massenergy exists spread across alternate universes?
VIRTUAL PHOTONS POSSESS POSITIVE GRAVITATIONAL MASSENERGY AND ZERO INERTIAL MASSENERGY.
Consider 3 hypotheses:
(1) Alternateuniverse virtual photons enter our observable universe and cause violations of Einstein’s equivalence principle and also violations of energy conservation in Einstein’s field equations.
(2) Dark matter (as opposed to unobserved standard massenergy) is the gravitational effect of the failure of Einstein’s equivalence principle for virtual massenergy.
(3) Mtheory is the explanation of the fundamental principle of the multiverse: Informational substrate makes Nambu digital data makes digital physical reality, where the 11dimensional supersymmetric model is the smoothing of the totality of the Nambu digital data over Nambu spacetime and Nambu energy.
On page 84 of Einstein’s “The Meaning of Relativity”, the equation (96) has the form Term1 – ½ (Term2) = Term3. Replace 1/2 by 1/A because of the violation of energy conservation by virtual massenergy from alternate universes. On page 89 of “The Meaning of Relativity”, Einstein wrote, “We see that the Newtonian gravitational constant <capital kappa>, is connected with the constant <small kappa> that enters into our field equation by the relation
(105) <capital kappa> = <small kappa> (csquared) / (8π)”
Write 2/A = 1 – f(div)/2. If we follow Einstein’s mathematical analysis, we should for empirical predictions systematically replace <small kappa> by <small kappa> / (1 – f(div)/2). Equivalently, for empirical predictions, replace <small kappa>/2 by <small kappa> / (2 – f(div)). A rough guess might be that 10**6 < f(div) < 10**4.
On page 88 of “The Meaning of Relativity”, Einstein suggests that, for most purposes, cosmologists can use <small sigma>, “the density of matter at rest, that is, the density of the ponderable matter, in the ordinary sense, measured with the aid of a unit measuring rod, and referred to a Galilean system of coordinates moving with the matter.”
According to the f(div) theory of modified general relativity theory, an Einsteinian reference frame is a valid model for standard massenergy ; however, the gravitational component of virtual massenergy leaves a gravitational effect that appears as dark matter, while the inertial component of virtual massenergy is identically zero. Therefore, <small sigma>, the energydensity of standard matter, needs to be replaced by <small sigma> plus the energydensity historical average of dark matter (i.e., the gravitational massenergy of virtual massenergy). The preceding ideas might be a valid way for understanding dark matter at nonrelativistic speeds; however, the relativistic theory would require the mathematical depth of Mtheory. The f(div) theory, if correct, would be essential in understanding a variety of astronomical phenomena.
http://www.zarm.unibremen.de/2fors...r_Magdeburg.pdf
Last edited by David Brown on 05162010 at 01:16 PM
Report this post to a moderator  IP: Logged
