David Brown
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 173 
What is the physical meaning of Mtheory?
I claim:
STEPHEN WOLFRAM CAN JUSTLY CLAIM TO BE A SERIOUS RIVAL TO ISAAC NEWTON AND ALBERT EINSTEIN.
WOLFRAM’S IDEAS ABOUT INFORMATION BELOW THE PLANCK SCALE ARE ESSENTIAL FOR EMPIRICAL PREDICTIONS FROM MTHEORY.
PARADIGMBREAKING PHOTONS ARE TO MTHEORY AS KEPLER’S LAWS ARE TO NEWTONIAN GRAVITATIONAL THEORY.
Am I wrong?
Consider 2 hypotheses:
(1) If paradigmbreaking photons do not exist, then I am a crackpot.
(2) If paradigmbreaking photons do exist, then I am THE CRACKPOT MESSIAH.
*******************
"But what is string theory? It may well be the only way to reconcile gravity and quantum mechanics, but what is the core idea behind it?" — Edward Witten
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~witten/papers/Unravelling.pdf
If Ed Witten is one of the greatest theoretical physicists in the history of science then why hasn’t he made any testable empirical predictions to prove the value of Mtheory for experimental physics? Does Mtheory describe the informational symmetries of black holes and the multiverse?
Consider some conjectures:
(1) THE MULTIVERSE IS FINITE AND DIGITAL.
(2) THERE ARE A HUGE, BUT FINITE, NUMBER OF ALTERNATE UNIVERSES.
(3) THE MAXIMUM PHYSICAL WAVELENGTH CONSISTS OF THE PLANCKLENGTH MULTIPLIED BY THE FREDKINWOLFRAM CONSTANT.
Let us assume the 3 preceding conjectures (CRAZY AS THEY SOUND) for the sake of argument. Is Mtheory the mathematical smoothingout of the FredkinWolfram information process that is the digital essence of the multiverse? Is Mtheory the bridge between Wolfram’s mobile automaton and theoretical physics in the form of quantum field theory and general relativity theory? Do Mtheorists need to incorporate the FredkinWolfram constant into Mtheory?
Consider the following conjecture:
The core idea behind Mtheory is to mathematically unify quantum field theory and general relativity in a physically valid way using Newton’s gravitational constant, the speed of light, and the Planck length. Mtheory without the FredkinWolfram constant allows stringlike entities to vibrate with infinitely many degrees of freedom, contrary to the way nature really works. By using the FredkinWolfram information process and the FredkinWolfram constant, Mtheorists can embed a computational structure into the mathematically smoothedout structure of Mtheory. By using the computational structure, Mtheorists can then predict the valid empirical probability distribution for paradigmbreaking photons. Additionally, Mtheorists can explain dark mater, dark energy, and perhaps other cosmological phenomena.
Is the preceding a lot of crackpot nonsense? Remember this:
STEPHEN WOLFRAM RECEIVED HIS PHYSICS PHD FROM CAL TECH WHEN HE WAS 20 YEARS OF AGE.
Last edited by David Brown on 05012010 at 06:41 AM
Report this post to a moderator  IP: Logged
