wolframscience.com

A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum > NKS Way of Thinking > Membrane theory and the decline of scientific method
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Vladimir Matveev
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia

Registered: May 2006
Posts: 2

Membrane theory and the decline of scientific method

Membrane theory and the decline of scientific method
Nanometer-minded persons in science

V.V. Matveev and D.N. Wheatley. "Fathers" and "sons" of theories in cell physiology: the membrane theory. Cell. Mol. Biol., 51(8): 797-801, 2005.

Abstract. The last 50 years in the history of life sciences are remarkable for a new important feature that looks as a great threat for their future. A profound specialization dominating in quickly developing fields of science causes a crisis of the scientific method. The essence of the method is a unity of two elements, the experimental data and the theory that explains them. To us, "fathers" of science, classically, were the creators of new ideas and theories. They were the true experts of their own theories. It is only they who have the right to say: "I am the theory". In other words, they were carriers of theories, of the theoretical knowledge. The fathers provided the necessary logical integrity to their theories, since theories in biology have still to be based on strict mathematical proofs. It is not true for sons. As a result of massive specialization, modern experts operate in very confined close spaces. They formulate particular rules far from the level of theory. The main theories of science are known to them only at the textbook level. Nowadays, nobody can say: "I am the theory". With whom, then is it possible to discuss today on a broader theoretical level? How can a classical theory - for example, the membrane one - be changed or even disproved under these conditions? How can the "sons" with their narrow education catch sight of membrane theory defects? As a result, "global" theories have few critics and control. Due to specialization, we have lost the ability to work at the experimental level of biology within the correct or appropriate theoretical context. The scientific method in its classic form is now being rapidly eroded. A good case can be made for "Membrane Theory", to which we will largely refer throughout this article.

Find full text here:
http://www.actomyosin.spb.ru/fathersandsons.htm

The illustration for the article:
http://www.bioparadigma.spb.ru/imag...rs.and.Sons.jpg

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-08-2006 06:53 AM
Vladimir Matveev is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Vladimir Matveev Click here to Send Vladimir Matveev a Private Message Click Here to Email Vladimir Matveev Visit Vladimir Matveev's homepage! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Vladimir Matveev
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia

Registered: May 2006
Posts: 2

Bloody battle

The bloody battle around of Fathers and Sons is happening here:
http://www.sciencechatforum.com/bul...?t=1537&start=0

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-20-2006 06:55 AM
Vladimir Matveev is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Vladimir Matveev Click here to Send Vladimir Matveev a Private Message Click Here to Email Vladimir Matveev Visit Vladimir Matveev's homepage! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


 

wolframscience.com  |  wolfram atlas  |  NKS online  |  Wolfram|Alpha  |  Wolfram Science Summer School  |  web resources  |  contact us

Forum Sponsored by Wolfram Research

© 2004-14 Wolfram Research, Inc. | Powered by vBulletin 2.3.0 © 2000-2002 Jelsoft Enterprises, Ltd. | Disclaimer | Archives