Posted by:

Hi people,

During the last 20 years I developed a new Mathematical theory, which is based on what I call:

Included-middle reasoning is:

If we compare between the excluded-middle reasoning (which is the standard reasoning that standing in the basis of the standard language of mathematics)

we can find these major differences:

In an excluded-middle reasoning, two opposites are

In an included-middle reasoning, two opposites are

If we achieve this goal, then I think that we improve our chances to survive the power of our technology.

I have found that included-middle reasoning has the properties to achieve this goal, after I developed some fundamental Mathematical works, which are based on its reasoning.

From this point of view, the mathematician's cognition abilities are taken as natural parts of the mathematical research itself, and this approach can be used to develop a gateway between his own morality development and his technical mathematical developments.

The main trigger behind this work is my interpretation to Drake's equation.

If we look at Drake's equation http://www.setileague.org/general/drake.htm we can find parameter

If we look on our civilization, I think that we cannot ignore

My work for the last 20 years is one of many possible ways to answer this every day question.

Though my research I have found that if some civilization has no balance between its morality level and its technological level, then there is a very high probability that its

Now, let us look at our

Most of the power of our technology is based on the Language of Mathematics and its reasoning, where the current reasoning is generally based on 0_XOR_1 logical reasoning, and there is nothing in this reasoning which researches the most important question which is: "How do we use this powerful Language in order to find the balance between our morality level and our technological level"?

If our answer is: "The Language of Mathematics has nothing to do with these kinds of questions", then in my opinion we quickly bring ourselves to find the exact

In my opinion, in order to avoid the final

Furthermore, we should not leave this question to be answered beyond the framework of our scientific methods, because no other framework, accept our scientific method can really determinate the destiny of our

My work can be found in http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheo...ry/CATpage.html and it is hard to follow especially for professional Mathematicians that most of their reasoning is based on the excluded-middle reasoning.

Anyway I would like to share with you my work and I'll be glad to get any detailed questions, comments and insights.

Thank you,

Doron

-----------------------------------------------------------------

My goal is to fulfill the dream of the great mathematician

Actually my number system ( which some arithmetic of it can be found in http://www.scienceforums.net/forums...89&postcount=20 ) is the fulfillment of Leibniz's Monads, and beyond it.

Posted by:

A comprehensive point of view of my work can be found in:

http://www.createforum.com/phpbb/in...forum=geproject

Thank you.

Forum Sponsored by Wolfram Research

© 2004-2014 Wolfram Research, Inc. | Powered by vBulletin 2.3.0 © 2000-2002 Jelsoft Enterprises, Ltd. |
Disclaimer**vB Easy Archive Final** - Created by Xenon and modified/released by SkuZZy from the Job Openings