[Theories of Everything and their Computational Equivalence] - A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum

A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum

Pages:1


Theories of Everything and their Computational Equivalence

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: John Newman

First of all, with out any spatio-temporal dimension, where's the causality? That being said...

Concerning sister photons (entanglement), could it be, instead of two seperate photons or nodes connected by a link being stretched across space, that rather it is really just one node remaining stationary, while two seperate matter nodes on either side of the photon node are actually sending links to the single photon node? Thus, giving the perception that two photons are crossing space? This would explain the quantum mechanical result we get, being that, for the photon, no space was crossed and no time was passed.

Could it be that one photon node could be perceived as actually many different photons if various other nodes are sending it links from different directions at different times? Could it be that all the photons in the universe, ney, all the particles in the universe are all just one node with googles of spatio-temporally differentiated links looping back into itself?

Possibly, but due to universality, can't the 'Theory Of Everything" be described and formulated in many different ways equally well? With however many different dimensions we see fit? If so, it seems we will just have to use occam's razor and utilize that formulation which is most easilly computed, or utilize the one that is used most easily for a specific application we are using. Does that make any sense?




Forum Sponsored by Wolfram Research

© 2004-2008 Wolfram Research, Inc. | Powered by vBulletin 2.3.0 © 2000-2002 Jelsoft Enterprises, Ltd. | Disclaimer
vB Easy Archive Final - Created by Xenon and modified/released by SkuZZy from the Job Openings